Search for: "James v. Rogers" Results 61 - 80 of 624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Although doctrines like Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Matthew Waxman
The combined cases—referred to collectively as Arver v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge James Ho's one-judge motions opinion yesterday in Lefebure v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the… [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
The CDC says that fully vaccinated people can "[v]isit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Chief Justice Roger Taney wrote the Southern interpretation into the Constitution in the Dred Scott v. [read post]