Search for: "Jane Doe 5, Medical Provider" Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2023, 7:33 pm by admin
Blakely, Raphael Bueno, Aleksandra Bzura, Giuseppe Cardillo, Jane E. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff retorts that this argument "just does not make sense" because the witnesses are medical professionals—or medical students—who often use the name "Jane Doe" to refer to unidentified female patients. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:18 am
Moderator: Jane Sarasohn-Kahn, THINK-HealthQ/A from the crowd:Trust lies in the individual user. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
The Drug Enforcement Administration announced in August that it is accelerating its review of applications by marijuana suppliers to provide the drug for research purposes (noting that in the last two years the agency has incre [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am by Katherine Pompilio
Shih, Robert & Jane Cizik professor of management practice in business administration at Harvard Business School; Chad P. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
How does it expand an individual’s right to carry arms outside of the home? [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 11:25 am by Jordan Brunner
The court is scheduled to complete filings on the request for a stay by April 5. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:29 pm by Elliot Setzer
While the position does not require relocation to Copenhagen, expect some travel for work and conferences. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm by Elliot Setzer
Thursday, March 5, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.: The Senate Armed Services Committee will hold a hearing on the posture of the Navy. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 1:36 pm by Elliot Setzer
UnLocal is committed to a community-centered, grassroots approach to protecting the rights and enhancing the lives of undocumented immigrants in New York City and providing legal representation to clients who are typically passed over by peer organizations. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 10:01 am
  Similarly Section 2(3) of the NLRA provides that the term "employee" does not include "any individual employed by an employer subject to the Railway Labor Act. [read post]