Search for: "Jane Doe I-X"
Results 1 - 20
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
In February, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Last month, I wrote about a Fourth Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Because the district court entered a default judgment on liability, we treat it as conclusively established that Cenk Sidar raped Jane Doe in London in September 2017. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:43 am
Jane Choukeir and Nadine Awadalla report for Reuters. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
App'x 409, 411 (10th Cir. 2005). [3] See infra the subheading "Requiring Plaintiffs to Name Themselves. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
HSLF does not judge candidates based on party affiliation or any other issue. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:35 am
Now, does he remember me? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Those applications include voice and video calling services, mobile apps, games, and, most importantly, websites like Twitter (X), YouTube, Facebook, and Medium. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Pa.): Plaintiff Jane Doe … [sued] to address purported violations of her constitutional rights arising from an incident with a male student, A.M., during the school day at Pine-Richland High School. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
I thought I'd pass along amicus brief that I submitted earlier this month in Doe v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:02 am
On the other hand, a statement that in effect communicates, "We have evidence that Jane Smith did X or said Y," when it turns out that she didn't do X or say Y, is treated as a factual assertion, which can indeed be actionable defamation. [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:57 pm
Yayoi Kusama x Louis Vuitton in 2012. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:56 am
A couple years ago, Ibram X. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm
So it’s not like a book, like I agreed to publish a book on x. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Dec. 9, 2022) Judge Jane Boyle joined Judge Sam Lindsay in finding that the standard form complaint used by a group of lawyers and their clients was inadequate. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:22 am
This means that Jane’s “basis” in the shares is $50 (10 shares x $5 per share). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
See id. at Apps. 2a & 2b. [3] See, e.g., Declaration of Jane Doe, Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
