Search for: "January 7, 2013 - January 24, 2013" Results 201 - 220 of 882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2014, 11:51 pm by Sean M. Cleary
Toxicology results revealed Espinoza-Rojas was under the influence of drugs during the December 7 crash, according to the arrest report. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 8:31 pm by Jeff Richardson
  So if you really feel the need to stream Netflix movies 24/7 in the middle of a park with no WiFi, you're all set. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 6:04 pm by Tanya Forsheit
S.B. 46, effective as of January 2014, added online account credentials to the type of personal information that could trigger notice requirements in the event of a security breach. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Despite this explanation, the representative informed the ED by letter dated 8 January 2010 that he would not attend the OPs scheduled for 12 January 2010. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:37 am by Denis Stearns
Among persons for whom information was available, illness onset dates ranged from January 12, 2013 to April 28, 2013. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 2:53 pm by S2KM Limited
"Under MMSEA section 111 requirements, group health plans began limited reporting of data in January 2009 and were fully phased in as of January 2011. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
Customs is supposed to weigh in on this redesign by January 12, 2024.[7]   If you are a patent owner who sympathizes with David versus Goliath, you probably are feeling dizzy by now and should check your blood-oxygen levels. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Once that threshold is reached further evidence will then be likely to be more relevant to quantum and any continuing dispute should ordinarily be left to trial. (4) Courts should ordinarily be slow to direct a preliminary issue, involving substantial evidence, on a dispute as to whether serious reputational harm has been caused or is likely to be caused by the published statement. (5) A defendant disputing the existence of serious harm may in an appropriate case, if the circumstances so warrant,… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Once that threshold is reached further evidence will then be likely to be more relevant to quantum and any continuing dispute should ordinarily be left to trial. (4) Courts should ordinarily be slow to direct a preliminary issue, involving substantial evidence, on a dispute as to whether serious reputational harm has been caused or is likely to be caused by the published statement. (5) A defendant disputing the existence of serious harm may in an appropriate case, if the circumstances so warrant,… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Once that threshold is reached further evidence will then be likely to be more relevant to quantum and any continuing dispute should ordinarily be left to trial. (4) Courts should ordinarily be slow to direct a preliminary issue, involving substantial evidence, on a dispute as to whether serious reputational harm has been caused or is likely to be caused by the published statement. (5) A defendant disputing the existence of serious harm may in an appropriate case, if the circumstances so warrant,… [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by michaellsullivan
STATUS: Passed out of House Ways & Means Committee on February 24, 2011. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
January 12th 2012 was Northern and Shell day at the Leveson inquiry. [read post]