Search for: "Jaskaran v City of New York"
Results 1 - 4
of 4
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
In contrast, in Matter of Jack Jaskaran, [Plaintiff] v The City of New York [Respondents], 2021 NY Slip Op 06762, decided December 2, 2021, the Appellate Division unanimously modified, on the law, Supreme Court's ruling addressing Plaintiff''s request for attorneys' fees, and remand the matter to lower court for further proceedings consistent it ruling on the issue. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
In contrast, in Matter of Jack Jaskaran, [Plaintiff] v The City of New York [Respondents], 2021 NY Slip Op 06762, decided December 2, 2021, the Appellate Division unanimously modified, on the law, Supreme Court's ruling addressing Plaintiff''s request for attorneys' fees, and remand the matter to lower court for further proceedings consistent it ruling on the issue. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:13 pm
The New York City law and others like it go way beyond that. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am
That is particularly true of New York City’s law, which gives squatters who claim to be tenants strong rights against removal if they have been on the property for at least 30 days. [read post]
