Search for: "Jason Mazzone"
Results 201 - 220
of 256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 8:47 pm
Over at Justia, Vikram Amar and Jason Mazzone make the case that there was not constitutional violation justifying federal court intervention. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:54 am
Consider this post from Brooklyn Law School professor Jason Mazzone on Balkinization (gavel bang: Legal Blog Watch):As far as I can tell, no law school in the United States co-exists in a university along with an academic law department. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:15 pm
Jason Mazzone had a great piece in TorrentFreak about SOPA, and see also stories about how the bill would re-write the DMCA, about Google's perspective, and about the Global Network Initiative's perspective. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:35 pm
And Jason Mazzone asks whether the majority’s inclusion of a photo of crowded prisoners really helps or hurts its case with the public. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:52 am
And discussing the decision at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone observes that the Court’s general approach to state court decisions “is to ignore all but the biggest errors. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:18 pm
Jason Mazzone had a great piece in TorrentFreak about SOPA, and see also stories about how the bill would re-write the DMCA, about Google’s perspective, and about the Global Network Initiative’s perspective. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
On the blog Balkinization, professors Jason Mazzone and Sandy Levinson engaged in a heated discussion as to the proper interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:27 pm
At the uber-liberal blawg Balkanization, Jason Mazzone writes that: In an interview published yesterday in the New York Law Journal, Judge Baer said that, given the discretion that Rule 23(g) gives to judges, he saw no reason why diversity could not be taken into account.I see a reason: the Constitution. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 12:49 pm
The Court may be "nonchalant," but, I think, this doctrine in particular is unusually weak as a vehicle for protecting "voting rights" under the Constitution.It’s also consistent with the views of Dean Vik Amar and Professor Jason Mazzone looking at this very case. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In my column last Thursday, I cited a Verdict column by Illinois Law’s Dean Vik Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:30 am
And as Jason Mazzone notes over at Balkinization, all these person-hours could well produce some serious social good. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
” At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone considers what Maples v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
- In a guest post for ACSblog, William Yeomans argues for an “enforceable code of conduct” for the Justices, while at Jason Mazzone of Balkinization considers the unintended consequences of such ethics rules. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:40 pm
Jason Mazzone, Jonathan Askin, and I are eagerly working to have Perry come to campus, both to present Paramount’s perspective and to discuss it with him. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:34 am
I just like them, and I think they’re worth a look.. . .The “JDC Blawg 21 List”Alan Crede’s “Boston Personal Injury Lawyer Blog”Jay Shepherd’s “Gruntled Employees” and “The Client Revolution”David Harlow’s “HealthBlawg”Bob Ambrogi’s “LawSites”AbacusLaw’s “Practice Smarter”RocketMatter’s “Legal Productivity Blog”Jim Calloway’s “Law Practice Tips… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
In The Huffington Post, Geoffrey Stone discusses a new law review article in which “law professors Robin Kar and Jason Mazzone have taken a deep dive into the history of Supreme Court nominations to test the plausibility of the Senate Republicans’ purported ‘justification’ for their action. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:20 am
Jason Mazzone comments here. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone suggests that “Judge Hudson’s opinion is written for Justice Scalia,” and that, “once read in light of Scalia’s concurring opinion in [Gonzales v.] [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:42 pm
Moreover, The Obama Administration now takes the position that legislation like that in DOMA, which discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation, should be subjected to heightened scrutiny, rather than rational basis scrutiny.As Jason Mazzone points out, Holder has also said in a letter to the Speaker of the House that in those circuits that hold as a matter of precedent that the rational basis test applies to distinctions based on sexual orientation, the Justice… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am
Jason Mazzone of Balkinization notes that, with the possibility of a four-four tie, the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the merits “will almost certainly be the last word in the case. [read post]
