Search for: "Jason Mazzone" Results 201 - 220 of 254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
Also at the New York Times, Jason Mazzone has an opinion piece on the challenges to health-care reform in which he concludes that “Judge Hudson’s analysis could prove irresistible to the Supreme Court and that there is a reasonable chance it will agree that the insurance mandate is invalid. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by Joe Singer
Jason Mazzone argues in the New York Times on Dec. 17, 2010, that Congress cannot force someone to buy medical insurance because it can only regulate what we do. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
The newspaper also contains an op-ed by law professor Jason Mazzone entitled "Can Congress Force You to Be Healthy? [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
  At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone suggests that “Judge Hudson’s opinion is written for Justice Scalia,” and that, “once read in light of Scalia’s concurring opinion in [Gonzales v.] [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:34 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But Brooklyn Law’s Jason Mazzone suggests Judge Hudson’s critics are misreading his opinion, which was written more for Justice Scalia than legal academics. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:43 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
For more on the handling of the Necessary & Proper Clause in this case, I recommend these posts outlining the views of Jason Mazzone, Kurt Lash, and Randy Barnett. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
” At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone makes the provocative argument that “[w]e could really diversify the Court by adding one kind of justice who has never served: a foreigner. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
  Jason Mazzone of Balkinization notes that, with the possibility of a four-four tie, the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the merits “will almost certainly be the last word in the case. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:52 am by John Steele
Jason Mazzone, at Balkinization, "Judge Baer and Grutter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:38 am by Ted Frank
Bainbridge points out that this contradicts the PSLRA, which doesn't permit judicial substitution of lead counsel appropriateness in a securities action, and agrees with Jason Mazzone that it's unconstitutional. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:27 pm by Steve Bainbridge
At the uber-liberal blawg Balkanization, Jason Mazzone writes that: In an interview published yesterday in the New York Law Journal, Judge Baer said that, given the discretion that Rule 23(g) gives to judges, he saw no reason why diversity could not be taken into account.I see a reason: the Constitution. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 10:35 am by James Bickford
”  At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone deems the occasional four-four tie to be preferable to the system recently proposed by Senator Patrick Leahy, in which a retired Justice would step in when an active Justice was recused. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:01 am by John Steele
" At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone isn't too impressed with the New York Times's take on the political activities of Justice Thomas's wife. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:48 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Jason Mazzone explains why Senator Patrick Leahy’s proposal to allow retired justices to participate in place of justices who have to recuse is “a solution in search of a problem. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am by Adam Chandler
” At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone writes that even though the respondent, Fred Phelps, is “the least likeable party in all of First Amendment jurisprudence,” Phelps “will [probably] win because even if the Court is inclined to apply lesser First Amendment protections to funeral protests, this is the wrong case for the Court to do it. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:45 am by Howard Wasserman
And Jason Mazzone offers his thoughts today.I am anxious to see (and, starting this term, hear, at least by the end of the week) how the oral argument goes. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:52 pm by Lawrence Solum
Alleman and Jason Mazzone (Brooklyn Law School and Brooklyn Law School) have posted The Case for Returning Politicians to the Supreme Court (Hastings L.J., 61, p., 1353, 2010) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:34 am
I just like them, and I think they’re worth a look.. . .The “JDC Blawg 21 List”Alan Crede’s “Boston Personal Injury Lawyer Blog”Jay Shepherd’s “Gruntled Employees” and “The Client Revolution”David Harlow’s “HealthBlawg”Bob Ambrogi’s “LawSites”AbacusLaw’s “Practice Smarter”RocketMatter’s “Legal Productivity Blog”Jim Calloway’s “Law Practice Tips… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 8:31 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Over at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone has an insightful post compared judicial confirmations and vacancies so far in the Obama era to those at the equivalent point in George W. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:39 am by Amanda Rice
”  Meanwhile, at the Full Disclosure blog of Forbes, Daniel Fisher agrees with Balkinization’s Jason Mazzone that “Liptak ignores the historic shift in the federal judiciary between 1975 and the present,” while at PrawfsBlawg, Paul Horowitz challenges Mazzone’s suggestion that law clerks should be “faithful lieutenants. [read post]