Search for: "Jason Mazzone" Results 221 - 240 of 254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 1:47 pm by Paul Horwitz
In particular, at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone argues:      Supreme Court Justices don’t need law clerks in order to hear every argument on every side of a case. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am by Adam Chandler
At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone responds to Liptak, arguing that his “claim about increased ideological hiring is exaggerated” because it does not account for an increase in the proportion of court of appeals judges nominated by Republican presidents – from thirty-seven percent in 1980 to fifty-seven percent today. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Check out Response to Adam Liptak on the Polarization of Supreme Court Clerks by Jason Mazzone on Balkinization. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:48 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Jonathan links below to Adam Liptak’s front-page New York Times article on the ideology of law clerks, and Jason Mazzone’s critique of it. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Jason Mazzone comments on Liptak’s story at Balkinzation. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:54 am by Elie Mystal
Consider this post from Brooklyn Law School professor Jason Mazzone on Balkinization (gavel bang: Legal Blog Watch):As far as I can tell, no law school in the United States co-exists in a university along with an academic law department. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:44 pm by Paul Horwitz
 In the legal blogosphere, a good deal of attention has been paid in particular to Jason Mazzone's post at Balkinization suggesting the division of the law school into two physically separate departments, one focused on the study of law as an academic subject and the other on professional education in lawyering. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 2:58 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
some interesting "Thoughts on Legal Education" from jason mazzone http://j.mp/aAG6EO Follow me on Twitter @peterjblack. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:11 am by Eric Lipman
Yesterday at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone of Brooklyn Law School came up with a way to employ even more professors. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Jason Mazzone has some very interesting thoughts in a post entitled "Thoughts on Legal Education". [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Adam Schlossman
At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone analyzes an assertion made by now-retired Justice Stevens in his dissenting opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am by Anna Christensen
” Finally, at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone explains how the October 2009 Term represented a “near-triumph” for the view of now-retired Justice Stevens that the Court should not grant review of criminal cases “in which the only alleged error is that the state court granted the defendant stronger protection than the Court’s own precedents require. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
In brief, here are today’s stories on the Supreme Court: At Balkinization, Jason Mazzone summarizes his research on Supreme Court review of state court decisions. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:01 am
Jason Mazzone of Brooklyn Law School; "Reconsidering Murdock: The Supreme Court’s Power to Reverse a State Supreme Court Solely on State-Law Grounds" by Prof. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
Jason Mazzone (Brooklyn Law School) has posted When the Supreme Court is Not Supreme on SSRN. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:56 pm
Professor Jason Mazzone (Brooklyn) just posted When the Supreme Court is Not Supreme on ssrn. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:20 pm
 This study runs alongside Minna Kotkin's study from last fall about the percentage of articles in leading law journals by women, which we spoke about here.Gender bias has been much in the legal academic blogosphere of late (like Jason Mazzone's creatively titled "Constitutional Law as Computer Science").I have a deep concern over the number of women writing in legal history. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:44 pm
Jason Mazzone at Concurring Opinions notes that whether one is interviewing applicants for junior faculty positions, whose claimed research interests often seem to take the form of "a conclusion that has already been drawn without the benefit of research", or... [read post]