Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 261 - 280
of 438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2012, 11:58 am
, by Jason Rantanen & Lee Petherbridge (summarized by Rantanen on Patently-O)Hollywood Deals: Soft Contracts for Hard Markets, by Jonathan BarnettFeaturing People in Ads, by Eric Goldman & Rebecca TushnetSolving the Patent Settlement Puzzle, by Einer Elhauge & Alex KruegerWhile all of these articles look interesting, as I've noted before, I think there is only a weak correlation between SSRN downloads and quality of scholarship; e.g., right now I am… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:45 am
By Jason Rantanen Over the past few months, I have heard numerous comments from folks about the perception that patents – or at least, enforcement of patents – is in decline. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
By Jason Rantanen Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen In 1998, John Allison and Mark Lemley published a groundbreaking empirical study of patent litigation, Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:19 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m a moderately-dedicated baseball fan*, so I’ve been listening** to quite a few baseball games over the past few weeks. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
By Jason Rantanen Circuit Check Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:52 pm
By Jason Rantanen Advanced Fiber Technologies (AFT) Trust v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:01 am
By Jason Rantanen In preparing for a talk on recent developments in patent law that I’m giving in a few days at the Salishan Patent Conference, I went back and reread Judge Dyk’s opinion concurring in the Federal Circuit’s denial of rehearing en banc in Sequenom v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:11 am
By Jason Rantanen Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:48 pm
By Jason Rantanen Mintz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:42 pm
By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, I discussed our conclusion that the Federal Circuit applies a stricter standard than the lower tribunals it reviews and that this preference for patentee success manifests through the intent to deceive component of the inequitable conduct analysis. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 10:19 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m a moderately-dedicated baseball fan*, so I’ve been listening** to quite a few baseball games over the past few weeks. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:10 am
By Jason Rantanen Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
By Jason Rantanen Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 10:38 am
By Jason Rantanen This post summarizes data on inter partes review proceedings and appeals from the Patent Office. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen In 1998, John Allison and Mark Lemley published a groundbreaking empirical study of patent litigation, Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:47 pm
By Jason Rantanen Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:11 am
By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, following the Supreme Court’s unanimous reversal of the Federal Circuit in Nautilus and Limelight, Vera Ranieri of the Electronic Frontier Foundation observed that: These rulings mean that the Federal Circuit has been unanimously overruled in every single patent case heard by the Supreme Court this term. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:54 pm
By Jason Rantanen Teva recently filed its merits brief in Teva v. [read post]
