Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 321 - 340
of 439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm
The economic ramifications of the newly created supplemental examination process are discussed by Professors Jason Rantanen and Lee Petherbridge in their highly engaging article, Toward a System of Invention Registration: The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act.Section 12 of the America Invents Act outlines a new method for supplemental examination. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 12:54 pm
By Jason Rantanen Dealertrack v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:51 am
By Jason Rantanen The America Invents Act contains several provisions that require the PTO to (1) issue new rules and (2) report back to Congress on specific patent-related issues. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm
By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced the proposed rules for supplemental examinations and proposed revisions to ex parte reexamination fees. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:39 pm
By Jason Rantanen Falana v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
By Jason Rantanen Streck, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:07 pm
By Jason Rantanen The number of patents involved in litigationThe number of patent suits filed each year is well known. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Becton Dickinson: A First Impression, by Jason Rantanen (Univ. of Iowa) and Lee Petherbridge (Loyola-LA); and Clarifying the Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct, by Elizabeth I. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
By Jason Rantanen Some of the most touted changes of the America Invents Act are its modifications to ex parte and inter partes reexaminations, modifications that are intended to fine tune these post-grant review mechanisms. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:47 am
Most notably, Professor Jason Rantanen is now a co-author, Lawrence Higgins is covering Bits and Bytes, and we have published a number of excellent guest posts both on the blog and in the associated short form Law Journal. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:40 pm
By Jason Rantanen Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 8:04 pm
By Jason Rantanen In re Ricoh Company, Ltd. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:24 pm
By Jason Rantanen As seen in the recent Powell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:20 am
By Jason Rantanen As every student of patent law knows, inventors were required to submit a working miniature model of their invention along with their patent application until the late nineteenth-century. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:33 pm
By Jason Rantanen Paul J. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:56 am
By Jason Rantanen Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:42 am
" Jason Rantanen has this post at "Patently-O. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
By Jason Rantanen As I commented yesterday, the Federal Circuit's statistics page no longer provides information about the disposal of patent infringement appeals by merits panels. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
By Jason Rantanen The Federal Circuit recently updated its statistics webpage with information for FY 2011 (October 2010-September 2011). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
By Jason Rantanen Robert Bosch LLC v. [read post]
