Search for: "Jeanes v. Jeanes" Results 81 - 100 of 1,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2016, 12:18 pm by David Honig
…Read more Case Review: Christie’s v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:27 pm
Oral Argument in case# 09-3255; Jean Marie Mudahinyu v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:02 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (2): In Andrew Joseph Wortkoetter v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:03 pm by Marcia Oddi
In a 28-page ruling issued today, Estate of Tammy Jean Vandam, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 8:31 am
Via Loeb and Loeb: Do Denim v Fried Denim: Although Plaintiff's opposition papers contain various generalized assertions about the nature of the jeans industry and the extent to which jeans designers rely on back-pocket-embroidered designs that may or may not be similar ot the Dragon Design, the Amended Compaint itself contains no factual allegation as to whether protecting the Dragon Design in the manner contemplated by the Plaintiff would put competitors at a… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:41 am
Briefs and other papers for the case may be found at TTABVUE via the link provided.April 28, 2020 - 1 PM: Jean Leon S.L. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:56 pm by Lawrence Solum
Mary Jean Dolan (The John Marshall Law School) has posted P.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:39 pm by constitutional lawblogger
The Ninth Circuit has granted a writ of habeas corpus to Debra Jean Milke, a woman on Arizona's death row for the 1990 death of her four year old child, in its opinion today in Milke v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Today: Lardashe jeans--it's quite possible they'd even fit me:Jordache Enters. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:03 am by Ralf Michaels
Part of the articles selected for presentation at the Workshop were published in Anais do V Workshop Jean Monnet Network – BRIDGE and the others were published in the V edition of the Latin American Journal of European Studies (2023-1). [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 10:54 pm by jmaddock
In a brief but meaningful decision rendered March 28, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada insisted on a new trial for Jean Philippe Mailhot, an accused individual whose right to a fair trial had been compromised by comments of the trial judge during the charge to the jury. [read post]