Search for: "Jeffers v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
I am an attorney, licensed to practice law in California (and also to appear in a number of federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
District Courts and in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including numerous IPRs currently pending before the PTAB. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:00 am
District Courts and in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including numerous IPRs currently pending before the PTAB. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am by Lissa Griffin
Fisher distinguished the Supreme Court’s precedent, for example, Jeffers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:54 am by Lissa Griffin
He distinguishes the Supreme Court’s decision in Jeffers v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:54 pm by Stan Gibson
With respect to the first opinion, whether method claims can be infringed by a sale or an offer for sale, the district court explained that Chapter 35 of the United States Code, Section 271(a) provides: “Except as otherwise provided in this title, whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term therefor,… [read post]
California Fish and Game Commission litigation Governor Gavin Newsom’s appointment of a fifth member of the California Fish and Game Commission That Commission’s October 9, 2022 hearing, where consideration of the petition to list the western Joshua tree (WJT) as a threatened species was continued for a second time The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the Bay-Delta longfin smelt on October 7 First, on September 21, 2022, the California… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
" Judge Ervin further found that the claim was not preempted under the National Flood Insurance Act Arbitration The case of United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
The NWPR was enacted during the Trump administration and represents the EPA’s latest attempt to define the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm by Stan Gibson
United States, 213 U.S.P.Q. at 940, 1980 WL 39083, at *4 (“The privilege only applies to the communication that takes place between the attorney and the client. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm by Stan Gibson
United States, 213 U.S.P.Q. at 940, 1980 WL 39083, at *4 (“The privilege only applies to the communication that takes place between the attorney and the client. [read post]