Search for: "Jefferson v. Brown et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 11:12 am
Jefferson County Board of Ed et al , had to do with the right of school districts to use race as a minor factor in determining school placement in certain circumstances (the decision applied to both cases). [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
D/B/A FORT BROWN CONDOSHARES AND LRI MANAGEMENT, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
We affirm.In Chanelle Linet Alexander, et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Brown, No. 05-0236 (Tex. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
MARY GARCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MELANY AVILA, DECEASED, ET AL.; from Jefferson County; 9th district (09-06-00136-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-26-06)07-0122 MARGARITA B. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
., et al v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Jarvis Brown, et al. quadruple homicide prosecution. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm
NAACP of Austin, et al., No. 09-0420 (DB). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Sessions, et al., the st [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:52 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., et al., No. 09-16-00357-CV, (Tex. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:28 pm
RECENT GEORGIA SUPREME COURT CASES Brown v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
After the Convention, once all was said and done, he wrote again to Jefferson: A check on the States appears to me necessary 1. to prevent encroachments on the General authority. 2. to prevent instability and injustice in the legislation of the States. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Jefferson. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm
Even more striking is the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
Jefferson Sessions (R-Citibank) that supposedly is a "compromise. [read post]
