Search for: "Jefferson v. Commonwealth"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am
Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, October 20, 2016, Cunningham, B.). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
"Gray v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
” (Batson v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:19 am
Image via WikipediaIn its 16-page decision last week in Jason Riley & The Courier-Journal, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:10 am
WBUR News reported on September 20, 2018 that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court will hear an interesting issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
S.J.L.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 8:56 pm
How sad that this great innovation for the jury location in the courtroom was offset by Virginia’s shameful past of slavery that gave way to its shameful Jim Crow history that carried right into 1966 with the Commonwealth’s going kicking and screaming before the Supreme Court fighting unsuccessfully to salvage segregated marriage in Loving v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
R.A.V. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Hudnell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Rex v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Now, from the Kentucky AG's friend-of-the-court brief for the Commonwealth in Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:46 am
Slaybaugh v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Benjamin Curtis – in his capacity as an attorney in Boston – argued in the 1836 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm
The issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 7:03 am
Thomas Jefferson Univ. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Smith and U.S. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
” Louisiana courts further define the scope of gross negligence in Tauzier v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Commonwealth, 702 S.W.2d 37 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1010, 106 S.Ct. 3311, 92 L.Ed.2d 724 (1986).In Sparks v. [read post]
