Search for: "Jefferson v. Public Safety " Results 41 - 60 of 136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
Similarly, “inherent in R.C. 2923.13(A)(2) is a policy decision made by the legislature that allowing weapons in the hands of individuals with certain prior juvenile adjudications poses an increased risk to public safety, as does allowing weapons in the hands of those with other disabling conditions such as chronic alcoholism or drug dependence,” wrote DeGenaro. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
The chief reliance of the citizens lay in the Committee of Safety. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Ross v Oxford Academy & CSD, 187 AD2d 898, leave to appeal denied, 81 NY2d 705]Suspending an employee for 30 days without pay for engaging in conduct that may result in a safety hazard. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am by John Floyd
It has often been rumored that the Texas Department of Public Safety allows the flow of drugs into the state so it can seize the drug profits leaving the state for Mexico. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Even history buffs have much to learn from Tyler’s account of the episodes that shaped the privilege of the writ and the constitutional provision foreclosing its suspension except when, “in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 11:00 am by Josh Blackman
There was scant mention of the possible harms to public safety. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by Mark Theodore
  The letter also stated, “By working sick, we are jeopardizing the entirety of [the company’s] image and risking public safety. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Article I, section 9, clause 2 of the Constitution stated: “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it. [read post]