Search for: "Jefferson v. Public Safety " Results 81 - 100 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.Article 14 provides: Prohibition of discriminationThe enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on… [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
However, Waldman muses that “it is clear that the gun issue is not one of evidence-based public safety policy, but of culture. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In a less widely followed case -  Public Citizen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
” United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Ct. 2009)(charges for public lewdness upheld where male patron of Effin Grovin Bar in Bellmore, New York, harrassed and then urinated on a female patron)Donovan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” That means examining gun rights versus public safety, and personal privacy versus security afforded by digital and surveilling technologies. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am by MBettman
” United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:03 pm by Charley Moore and Eva Arevuo
For weeks, city mayors were voicing concerns over the health, safety and public order issues posed by the encampments. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by Kelly Goles
On September 14, the Law Library held its annual Constitution Day event, which featured Harvard Law School Professor Mark V. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]