Search for: "Jeffrey Rachlinski"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2009, 7:27 pm
Rachlinski & Andrew J. [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:47 pm
The footnote 17 debacle is, of course, a recent and salient example of how the Court can go wrong when evaluating empirical work: “Cornell law professor Jeffrey Rachlinski told the Times that [Ted] Eisenberg's study shows "punitive damages are pretty orderly," yet Souter did not seem to think any studies had proven that point. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
Rachlinski (Cornell), and Andrew J. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:52 am
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 8:15 am
Gregory Park and Professor Jeffrey Rachlinksi debate Professor Richard Epstein on the implications of President Obama's election on race-based policies such as affirmative action and antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:17 pm
Rachlinski and Andrew J. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:43 am
Cornell Law School profs Gregory Scott Parks and Jeffrey J. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:17 pm
Gregory Scott Parks and Jeffrey J. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:45 pm
____ days (see below for answers) In an interesting new article, Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey Rachlinski, and Andrew Wistrich report the answers of 252 Florida trial judges to this Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), which is designed to have a "correct answer that is easy to discern upon reflection, [as well as] an intuitive--but incorrect--answer that almost immediately comes to mind. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:32 am
Rachlinski of Cornell Law School and U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 5:50 pm
RACHLINSKI, Cornell Law School -and- ANDREW J. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
But a recent paper (Guthrie, Chris, Rachlinski , Jeffrey J. and Wistrich, Andrew J., “Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases” . [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:49 am
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey Rachlinski, and Andrew J Wistrich's Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases is now availabe from SSRN. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 6:30 am
Rachlinski & Andrew J. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Rachlinski & Andrew J. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:41 am
Panel III: Law and Emotions in Action Goldberg Room, School of Law (Boalt Hall), University of California, Berkeley Speakers: Susan Bandes (chair), College of Law, DePaul University Peter Huang, Beasley School of Law, Temple University, "Law and Human Flourishing: Happiness, Affective Neuroscience, and Paternalism" [abstract] [precis] Dan Kahan, Yale Law School, "Two Conceptions of Emotion in Risk Regulation" [abstract] [full paper] Sharon Krause, Department of Political Science,… [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:51 am
Keynote Speakers: Arlie Hochschild and Dacher KeltnerConfirmed speakers: Kathy Abrams, Susan Bandes, Jeremy Blumenthal, Devon Carbado, Cheshire Calhoun, Laurel Fletcher, Angela Harris, Oliver Goodenough, Peter Huang, Owen Jones, Dan Kahan, Hila Keren, Sharon Krause, Terry Maroney, Elizabeth Phelps, Jeffrey Rachlinski, Carol Sanger, Susan Silbey, Elizabeth V. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
Chris Guthrie and Jeffrey J. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 11:47 pm
Keynote Speakers: Arlie Hochschild and Dacher Keltner Confirmed speakers: Kathy Abrams, Susan Bandes, Jeremy Blumenthal, Devon Carbado, Laurel Fletcher, Oliver Goodenough, Mitu Gulati, Peter Huang, Owen Jones, Dan Kahan, Hila Keren, Sharon Krause, Terry Maroney, Elizabeth Phelps, Jeffrey Rachlinski, Carol Sanger, Susan Silbey, Elizabeth V. [read post]
