Search for: "Jennifer Rothman"
Results 1 - 20
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
For further information about the Roundtable, please email either: Barton Beebe (NYU): barton.beebe@nyu.edu; Jennifer Rothman (Penn): rothmj@law.upenn.edu, or Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard): rtushnet@law.harvard.edu.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am
As Jennifer Rothman has written, different IP regimes define commercial use differently. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:27 pm
Professor Jennifer Rothman has an excellent analysis of the bill, including its most dangerous aspect: creating a new, and transferable, federal publicity right that would extend for 70 years past the death of the person whose image is purportedly replicated. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Examples of trademark experts with this view include professors Rebecca Tushnet and Jennifer Rothman; attorneys Megan Bannigan, David Bernstein, Timothy Cuffman, and Jon Jekel; and news reporters from the New York Times (Adam Liptak) and Bloomberg (Greg Stohr). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
PLI Media Law conference RT: There’s been a rapid and somewhat disorienting shift from a seemingly ever-growing First Amendment freedom of speech to a seeming indifference to speech and press based claims (as contrasted to religious freedom claims) in many categories, concentrated in the sudden conservative abandonment of the commercial speech doctrine. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Guest Post by Samuel F. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:15 am
For further information about the Roundtable, please email either: Barton Beebe (NYU): barton.beebe@nyu.edu; Jennifer Rothman (Penn): rothmj@law.upenn.edu, or Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard): rtushnet@law.harvard.edu. http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:15 am
The Legal Theory Bookworm recommends Essentially a Mother: A Feminist Approach to the Law of Pregnancy and Motherhood by Jennifer Hendricks. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 6:20 am
For further information about the Roundtable, please email either: Barton Beebe (NYU): barton.beebe@nyu.edu; Jennifer Rothman (Penn): rothmj@law.upenn.edu, or Rebecca Tushnet (Harvard): rtushnet@law.harvard.edu. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
I’d like to thank the members of the SEC staff who worked on this proposal, including: Randall Roy, Nina Kostyukovsky, Haoxiang Zhu, David Saltiel, Andrea Orr, Michael Macchiaroli, Thomas McGowan, Ray Lombardo, Matthew Lee, Stephanie Park, Kevin Schopp, Moshe Rothman, Carol McGee, John Guidroz, Russell Mancuso, Michael E. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
by Soleil Hawley Have you ever wondered about the legality of performances by hologram Elvis and hologram Michael Jackson? [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
by Soleil Hawley Have you ever wondered about the legality of performances by hologram Elvis and hologram Michael Jackson? [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Rothman, John B. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Jennifer Rothman: May want to spend time defining what you mean by privacy to deal with the gov’t q. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm
Jennifer Rothman: does the survey focus on political valence in a way that exacerbates the likely effect versus how many people in the general population even knew there was an objection. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:58 am
Am., Inc., 971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir.1992), as amended (Aug. 19, 1992). [4] Id. at 1396. [5] Jennifer E. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 4:47 am
Professor Jennifer E. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
., Rebecca Tushnet, Jennifer Rothman, and John Welch, so this blog post will focus on the implications of the decision rather than provide a detailed summary of it. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
Rebecca Tushnet Bad Spaniels, Deceptive Raptors, and Tiny Hands: The Persistence of Commercial Speech as a Category Jennifer Rothman has done related work, but her focus has been on the different definitions of commerciality across IP regimes; I’m interested in a different question: holding constant the definition of commercial speech as defined by First Amendment jurisprudence, which is basically speech that does no more than merely propose a commercial transaction, does the… [read post]
