Search for: "Jennifer v. Dept. of Corrections"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 3:20 pm
Moose; Jennifer L. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 3:01 am
So it was with Rondeau v Bargman 2017 NY Slip Op 32256(U) October 19, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153727/16 Judge: Jennifer G. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Jennifer L. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Dept. of Corrections).......................................15Trial Tr., Timberlake v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
In Drumm v Drumm, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975452 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 09597-19 Bremner v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication09539-19 A Woman v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 6 Children (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), Breach- sanction: publication of adjudication 09155-19 Brown v thesundaytimes.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 07966-19 Water UK v The Times,1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction:… [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am
In many if not most instances, that would be correct. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
Dept. of Child Svc [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:41 am
The proverb “All for the want of a horseshoe nail” aptly describes the possibly mortal blow dealt by the Appellate Division’s recent decision in Favourite Ltd. v Cico, 2020 NY Slip Op 01463 [1st Dept Mar. 3, 2020], to a lawsuit initiated by non-managing members of a manager-managed Delaware LLC whose certificate of formation was cancelled for the ministerial failure to designate a new registered agent within 30 days after its old one resigned. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The lawyer’s right to make a living cannot trump the rights of ordinary people to access justice Here is the Canadian Lawyer survey, (referred to by Jennifer Leitch) showing rising legal fees and profitability of family law: https://t.co/V9nvz6Ipzo? [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
