Search for: "Jennings v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
This article analyses how a young man who might have been marginalized in society because of the circumstances of his birth, ethnic origin, and religious identity rose to prominence in law, politics, and business in the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 6:48 am
Lee Jen Fair, 818 F.3d 72, 81 n.3 (2d Cir. 2016). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
§§ 1225(b), 1226(a), and 1226(c) in Jennings v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 5:50 am
Jennings, supra (quoting State v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Since at least 1924, when the Supreme Court endorsed it in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:09 pm
Nafziger, reviewing The Assault on International Law, by Jens David Ohlin Peter J. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
Hadley Baker shared appellate briefs from both parties in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 5:37 am
Circuit in the Qassim v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:14 pm
It has been focused on states, rather than non-state actors. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the… [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
’” Jennings v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:06 pm
Supreme Court handed down a critical decision on this issue in Jennings v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
United States, a case involving the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 7:06 am
As the Colorado Supreme Court stated in Kane v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
State. [read post]
