Search for: "Jensen v. Powers"
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 3:04 pm
(citing Jensen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:48 am
In a recent decision, Jensen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
In a recent decision, Jensen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:38 am
Bret Stephens wonders why he and fellow journalists ignored the fact that “[a]lmost from the beginning, there was something amiss in the case of People v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:32 pm
In 2007, the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) adopted and began enforcing rules that regulate diesel-powered engines. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
Jensen Mo., 359 S.W.2d 343, 349.) [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
Ed Whitfield (R-KY), Chairman of the Energy and Power Subcommittee, and Sen. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
While notions of shareholder democracy permit powerful rhetoric, corporations are not New England town meetings. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
Jensen writes that “the general proposition of [CAAF's United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:14 pm
Waples v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In Yugraneft Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:08 am
Coverage of the memorial cross stolen from the Mojave desert — the one at issue in this Term’s Salazar v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Food and Drug Administration, so that it can align--that is, harmonize--its regulations with international standards developed by powerful vested interests. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am
Richey also writes on the denial of cert in Jensen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:16 am
They're a powerful class, the exact opposite. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Especially in view of the 1976 amendment to the FDCA which specified the powers of the Secretary in regulating medical devices, any state law which would put these same powers in other hands must be deemed foreclosed. . . . [read post]
