Search for: "Jeremy Rosen"
Results 141 - 149
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2008, 10:51 am
And they did so despite the opportunity to join a dissent based at least in part on a commitment to state-sovereignty principles.My co-blogger Jeremy Rosen has touched on this same issue in his posts about the role of conservative judges in punitive damages litigation and the possible impact of the presidential election on the Court's decisions in this area. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:05 am
Join these experts: - Christine Daly, Partner, Holme Roberts & Owen LLP - Elizabeth Drigotas, Principal, Washington National Tax, Deloitte Tax LLP - Jeremy Goldstein, Partner, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz - Mike Kesner, Head of Deloitte Consulting's Executive Compensation Practice - Paula Todd, Managing Principal, Towers Perrin You may want to print out these "Course Materials," which consist of notes regarding hypothetical 162(m) scenarios… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 2:23 pm
Last night, in that firm's punitive damages blog California Punitive Damages - An Exemplary Blog, Horwitz's Jeremy Rosen quibbled with my characterization of the San Luis Obispo County judge as "conservative" for reducing the jury's punitive verdict from $10,000,000.76 (a cute nod to Unocal's former name, Union 76) to $5,000,000. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:23 am
"2008 Election, the Supreme Court and Punitive Damages": Jeremy Rosen has this post at the blog "California Punitive Damages. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:57 pm
I hope the winner isn't making plans to spend the $33 million quite yet.Hat tip to Howard Bashman.UPDATE (By Jeremy Rosen on 2/7/08 at 3:45 pm): On the other hand, the plaintiff may take comfort in the fact that the New Mexico appellate courts have been named as "dishonorable mention judicial hellholes" by ATRA. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:10 am
Eventually the Supreme Court will need to revisit the issue and sort out this mess.Hat tip to Sean Andrussier at North Carolina Appellate Blog.UPDATE (By Jeremy Rosen on 2/6/2008 at 11:37 am): North Carolina is one of the many states which by statute have set limits on punitive damages. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:48 am
I'm certainly no expert on Ohio law, but this decision appears to represent a sea change in that state's high court, at least with respect to punitive damages.FURTHER UPDATE (by Jeremy Rosen on 2/5/08 at 10:45 pm): To follow-up on Curt's point, a 2004 analysis of the Ohio Supreme Court describes its history of decisions striking down tort reform legislation passed by the Legislature and suggests that the court was then at a crossroads with a consistent 4-3 split. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 8:12 am
That was the invention of the 18th century British economist Jeremy Bentham, who conceived of the Panopticon as a circular prison in which warders could see prisoners at all times. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:49 am
Justice Brennan, for example, signed his share of opinions that he could not possibly have believed because they were effective way-stations on the way to what he hoped, at a later time, would become the final view of the Court.Along this line, I commend a review by Jeremy Waldron in the current New York Review of books on two recent books, by Jeffrey Rosen and Jan Crawford Greenburg, on the Supreme Court. [read post]
