Search for: "Jeremy Telman"
Results 21 - 40
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2020, 9:51 am
Thanks to Blogarch Jeremy Telman for the generous (re)introductory post today. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:24 pm
With appropriately excessive kudos to our new-and-returning Blogarch Jeremy Telman (Blogarch, if you were wondering, is a high level network official just a step below the undisputed Blog Emperor, Paul Caron), I'm delighted to bring back the weekly Top Ten... [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 11:48 am
Jeremy Telman, All That is Liquidated Melts Into Air: Five Meta-Interpretive Issues, 24 Barry L. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Jeremy Telman, Originalism and Second-Order IPSE Dixit Reasoning in Chisholm v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
In the comments to this post, Jeremy Telman and I had a short exchange on the extent to which SCOTUS justices have been, or will continue to be, nominated on the basis of “legal acumen,” should life tenure be eliminated. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:20 am
Jeremy Telman, Originalism as Fable (Reviewing Eric Segall, Originalism as Faith), (August 29, 2018).Maliheh Zare, Creating Laws for Economic Growth in a Hybrid Islamic Legal System, (Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, Forthcoming).Gila Stopler, How Could Religious Liberty Be a Human Right: A Reply to Andrew Koppelman, (Forthcoming in 16(3) INT’L J. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:19 am
Jeremy TelmanIn my previous post, I stated that I had found, like many others, that the John Marshall Court was pluralist in its approach to constitutional interpretation. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 5:56 pm
Jeremy TelmanThe version of originalism popularized in the 1980s viewed itself as a reform movement, responding to the perceived excesses of the Warren and Burger Courts. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Jeremy Telman, Valparaiso University Law School, has posted John Marshall's Constitution: Distinguishing Originalism from Ipse Dixit in Constitutional Adjudication:This Article is the first comprehensive treatment of the constitutional jurisprudence of the Marshall Court (1801–1835) from the perspective of originalism. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 3:18 am
UPDATE: In response to Jeremy Telman's comment: Of course, I can find a rhyme for "he. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:05 am
Jeremy Telman, The Free Exercise Clause and Hans Kelsen's Modernist Secularism, (Hans Kelsen in American–Selective Affinities and the Mysteries of Academic Influence (Springer 2016)).Michel Rosenfeld, The Conscience Wars in Historical and Philosophical Perspective: The Clash between Religious Absolutes and Democratic Pluralism, (The Conscience Wars: Rethinking the Balance between Religion, Identity, and Equality (Cambridge University Press 2018) (Susanna Mancini &… [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:36 am
Jeremy Telman, The African-American Interest in Higher Law in the Supreme Court: Justices Marshall and Thomas Jeremy I. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:37 am
Jeremy Telman, Valparaiso University Law School, has posted The African-American Interest in Higher Law in the Supreme Court: Justices Marshall and Thomas, which is forthcoming in the Temple International and Comparative Law Journal:This paper was written for a Festschrift in honor of Henry J. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:05 am
Jeremy Telman, The African-American Interest in Higher Law in the Supreme Court: Justices Marshall and Thomas, (31 Temple Int'l & Comp. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:26 am
Jeremy Telman, Valparaiso University Law School, is publishing Originalism: A Thing Worth Doing . . . in volume 42 of Ohio Northern University Law Review (2016). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
Jeremy Telman, Valparaiso University Law School, has posted Originalism: A Thing Worth Doing . . ., which is forthcoming in volume 42 of the Ohio North University Law Review:Originalism in constitutional interpretation continues to grow in its reach, its sophistication, its practical applicability and its popular support. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:17 am
As you perhaps know, Jeremy Telman wishes to stop blogging for the ContractsProf Blog after around a decade of doing so. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:27 am
I wanted to follow up on Jeremy Telman's posts about two cases, Andermann v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:02 pm
In the latest round of discussion on the subject, Mike Simkovic on Brian Leiter’s blog (here, here, and here), and Jeremy Telman of Valparaiso Law on his own blog (here and here) argue that imposing competitive and demanding conditions on law-school financial aid is a good practice. [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:30 pm
Having been one of the people who brought attention to the issue of conditional scholarships a few years ago, I feel compelled to offer a few insights on a rekindled conversation about conditional scholarships involving Jeremy Telman and Michael Simkovic... [read post]
