Search for: "Jersey City v. Dept. of Civil Service" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2015, 10:02 am
The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) expressly prohibits both types of discrimination, but Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 only protects people from discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, and national origin. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:59 am
   NO-FAULT – MEDICAL NECESSITY OF CHIROPRACTIC TREATMENT – QUESTION OF FACT Co-Op City Chiropractic, P.C. a/a/o Gloria Fagan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
” The Affidavit of Service was not signed before a notary public or other authorized official (see generally U.S. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
City of LovelandCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-1311 November 15, 2011 Judge: Anderson Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Plaintiffs Edward Klen, Diverse Construction, Stephen Klen and Holstein Self-Service Storage, LLC brought a civil rights lawsuit against the City of Loveland Colorado and various City employees alleging "a… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
New Jersey Court Rejects Reverse Discrimination Claims Based on Speculative EvidenceHunter v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pension* December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript here* SCOTUSWIKI here * LIIBULLETIN hereGross v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
State Dept. of Corrections, 53 P.3d 1115, 1124 n.38 (Alaska 2002); Laznovsky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono December 10, 2008 Argument Transcript hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereGross v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972) ("there is no privilege. . . in an action in which the condition of the patient is an element or factor of the claim or defense of the patient"); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]