Search for: "Jersey Land and Development Corporation, a New Jersey Corp. v. United States of America, Appellant"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
New Jersey and Ring v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court found that substantial evidence supported the trial court’s decision as to the prescriptive rights because the trial court considered Tapia’s evidence but made a credibility determination based upon other evidence that Tapia’s claimed water use far exceeded the amount required on the land under cultivation. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
” Representative Matters Representative Appellate Matters Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The appellate court found that substantial evidence supported the trial court’s decision as to the prescriptive rights because the trial court considered Tapia’s evidence but made a credibility determination based upon other evidence that Tapia’s claimed water use far exceeded the amount required on the land under cultivation. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
In what is shaping up to be a developed versus developing country slugfest of words, developing countries have released a draft of their own. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
– EPA News Release, June 4, 2010 PBI-Gordon Corporation, a Kansas City, Mo., pesticide manufacturer, has agreed to pay a $6,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations related to the importation of more than 147 tons of a misbranded pesticide from Argentina. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
– EPA News Release, June 4, 2010 PBI-Gordon Corporation, a Kansas City, Mo., pesticide manufacturer, has agreed to pay a $6,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations related to the importation of more than 147 tons of a misbranded pesticide from Argentina. [read post]
