Search for: "Jersey v. Zoning Board of Appeals" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 7:42 am by Michael DeRose
As stated in NJ.com, in December of 2012, a former Jersey City municipal inspector, Bennie Anderson, took a $300 payoff to change the tax description on a building zoned for two units to one zoned for three units. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
T-Mobile Northeast, LLC v Township of West Deptford Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 4098140 (NJ Sup. 8/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-unpublished/2014/a4188-12.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
Planning/Zoning Board of the Borough of Sea BrightLAND USE AND PLANNING - Variances - Voting Requirement"Only seven of the nine members of a planning board, acting as a board of adjustment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-25(c), may vote on an application for a "d" variance application under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d); alternates may not be substituted. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 10:23 am by admin
Town of Milton Board of Health v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
Defendants appealed, and the trial court judge, Judge Owens, approved Defendant's application for a zone change. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:22 pm
The University of Iowa and The Board of Regents, State of Iowa v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
  Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit ordered new trial because of juror misconduct. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 1:03 am
Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-4225 November 15, 2011 Judge: Kelly Areas of Law: ERISA, Government & Administrative Law, Insurance Law Plaintiff-Appellant Eugene S. appealed a district court's denial of his motion to strike and its entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (Horizon BCBSNJ). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]