Search for: "Jessica Silbey"
Results 21 - 40
of 196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2022, 3:30 am
Jessica Silbey Professor Kara Swanson’s latest article is a remarkable example of legal historical scholarship that excavates stories from the past to illuminate the present. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
Ann Bartow, Jim Gibson, James Grimmelmann, Mark Lemley, Phil Malone, Mark McKenna, Lisa Ramsey, Jeremy Sheff, Jessica Silbey, Christopher Sprigman, and Rebecca Tushnet. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:57 pm
Copyright’s Higher Pleasures David A. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:10 am
Jessica Silbey is a Professor of law at Boston University and has written numerous other books on intellectual property. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Intro, Graeme Dinwoodie Ornamentality is undertheorized. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:14 am
” Law professor Jessica Silbey has this essay online at Salon. [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:07 pm
Forthcoming: Jessica Silbey, Professor of Law, Boston University, is publishing Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Information Age (Stanford University Press, 2022). [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:07 pm
Forthcoming: Jessica Silbey, Professor of Law, Boston University, is publishing Against Progress: Intellectual Property and Fundamental Values in the Information Age (Stanford University Press, 2022). [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:32 pm
Jessica Silbey has written (another) groundbreaking book about the future of intellectual property, innovation, and equality. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:13 am
The First Circuit rejected the scheme, and Jessica Silbey and I excoriated the case in our Copyright’s Memory Hole paper. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm
Jessica M. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm
Jessica Silbey, Section 102(b) and the Fact Exclusion Genealogy in U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
Rebecca Tushnet Bad Spaniels, Deceptive Raptors, and Tiny Hands: The Persistence of Commercial Speech as a Category Jennifer Rothman has done related work, but her focus has been on the different definitions of commerciality across IP regimes; I’m interested in a different question: holding constant the definition of commercial speech as defined by First Amendment jurisprudence, which is basically speech that does no more than merely propose a commercial transaction, does the Lanham Act cover… [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Jessica Silbey: Hiba Hafiz’s new paper The Brand Defense is relevant. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm
Jessica Silbey: Methodology chapter could be very good as an appendix. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:02 am
Schragger, University of Virginia School of Law Alison Siegler, University of Chicago Law School Jessica Silbey, Boston University School of Law Joseph Thai, University of Oklahoma College of Law Lisa A. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:08 am
Using several examples from their own research, Gallagher and Halbert explain how qualitative interview methods can be applied to IP, with a step-by-step analysis of each stage.The discussion is followed in Chapter 37, where Jessica Silbey considers how qualitative research methods may be applied to studies of IP and ethnography. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
They also discuss Professor Silbey’s expertise in film and its evolving uses as a legal tool.Professor Jessica Silbey is a Professor of Law at Boston University School of Law where she teaches and writes in the areas of intellectual property, constitutional law, and law and the humanities. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 2:00 am
Kahn, Professor of Law and Biology, Northeastern University School of Law Jessica Silbey, Professor of Law and Yanakakis Faculty Research Scholar, Boston University School of Law Co-sponsored by the Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Harvard Law School Library, and Harvard Book Store, which is a locally owned, independently run Cambridge landmark since 1932. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:20 pm
And irrespective of the preconditions for Pennsylvania publicity rights protection, as Jessica Silbey and I documented in our Copyright’s Memory Hole paper, plaintiffs pile into the IP exception to Section 230 for the express purpose of chilling free speech. [read post]
