Search for: "Jessie v. Sanders et al" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLINGHELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ. 2022-05342(Index No. 55745/22) [*1]Jessie Sander, appellant, vWestchester Reform Temple, et al., respondents. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Plaintiff's claim that the termination her employment violated Labor Law §201-d(2)(c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours, rejected
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DOWLINGHELEN VOUTSINAS, JJ. 2022-05342(Index No. 55745/22) [*1]Jessie Sander, appellant, vWestchester Reform Temple, et al., respondents. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 2 today (and 5 NFP)
12 Mar 2007, 10:13 am
[ILB note] Judge Riley also wrote the Jan. 9, 2007 majority opinion in Austin Elliot, et al v. [read post]
The Indiana Law Blog - http://indianalawblog.com/