Search for: "Jett v. Jett"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 4:31 pm
In Houston v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
” Interesting, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination previously held in cases such as Jette v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Cette discordance n'émeut pas la Chambre : il est inhabituel que des témoins se souviennent des circonstances exactes d'un événement qui s'est tenu plus de 10 ans en arrière, sauf fait remarquable. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in Jett v Dallas… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Image via WikipediaThe North Carolina Court of Appeals in Mark Ward v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:47 am
Jett, 2009 U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
More than a century later, lawyers revived § 1981 to pursue discrimination actions against state governments, only to be shot down by Jett v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
§1981.Citing Monell v New York Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, the Circuit Court commented that the Supreme Court had ruled that a municipality may not be held vicariously liable for the federal constitutional or statutory violations of its employees.Although Monell concerned lawsuit brought pursuant to 42 USC §1983, the Third Circuit said that the Supreme Court had extended its holding in Monell to §1981 actions in its ruling in… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 5:08 pm
In Kevin Unthank v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
(quoting Jett v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:42 pm
In Ward v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:27 am
Jett v. [read post]
