Search for: "Jim Greiner"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2012, 10:16 am
Special thanks to Jim Singer, Tom Galvani, Ron Coleman, Ryan Gile, and Jack Greiner for their sharing links, thoughts, and experience. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:07 am
As part of a larger study, Jim Greiner, Lois Lupica, a couple of dozen students, and I have been working to create a DIY guide to a no-asset Chapter 7 bankruptcy guide, complete with a module on representing yourself through an adversary proceeding to discharge student loans. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
People who see their role as not only to be impartial but also to see that banks follow the rules. 11:28- Fairly effective job on a different model of where to put the resources. 11:29- Greiner: We’ve been inspired, informed, and now I’m going to annoy you. [read post]
15 May 2013, 11:57 am
I am also collaborating with my wonderful and indefatigable colleague Jim Greiner and a colleague in the LSP world to do further work concerning experimentation in the delivery of legal services and the research ethics and research design issues it raises. - I. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
Crosspost from Freakonomics:Harvard Professors Jim Greiner and Cassandra Pattanayak have posted a remarkable randomized experiment (“What Difference Representation? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
James Greiner, Dalié Jiménez and Lois R. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 9:14 am
Robel 07/18/2011 Jenifer Lee Edison Mission Energy 07/18/2011 Bonnie Bath Epler 07/18/2011 Steven Grasty Harney County Court 07/18/2011 Jim Madden Element Power 07/18/2011 Barbara Durkin 07/18/2011 Maxine A. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:42 pm
Jim Greiner at Harvard has done some excellent work in this field, as have a few other legal scholars, but we need much more. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
" Ian Ayres refers us to a study bound to give a certain subset of lawyers and law professors pause: Harvard Professors Jim Greiner and Cassandra Pattanayak have posted a remarkable randomized experiment (“What Difference Representation? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Defenders of Section 5 argue that the coverage formula is constitutionally adequate because it captures most of the former Jim Crow South, where intentional racial discrimination in the electoral process is likely to be worse than in other states. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Defenders of Section 5 argue that the coverage formula is constitutionally adequate because it captures most of the former Jim Crow South, where intentional racial discrimination in the electoral process is likely to be worse than in other states. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:37 pm
See Greiner, Jiménez, and Lupica's "Self-Help Re-Imagined," generated as part of a more encompassing project of the Harvard Law School's Access to Justice Lab. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
Offers, Actual Use, and the Need for Randomization, the forthcoming Yale Law Journal article by Jim Greiner and Cassandra Wolos Pattanayak. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:56 am
Jim Greiner. [read post]
