Search for: "Jim Lindgren" Results 121 - 140 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2009, 5:52 am
UPDATE: Jim Lindgren: “Compared to recent nominees, Sotomayor is a far more distinguished choice than was Harriet Miers (whom I opposed), but a less distinguished choice than John Roberts â€â [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:48 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) The Chronicle of Higher Education confirms my research and Big Journalism’s initial doubts that Michael Bellesiles’s story published in the Chronicle Review is false. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:38 am by Glenn Reynolds
(Here’s a thorough dissection by Jim Lindgren in the Yale Law Journal — it’s a PDF; here’s a shorter summary from Wikipedia, and a thorough summary by Joyce Malcolm.) [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) In the latest New Yorker, Hendrik Hertzberg endorses 18-year term limits for Supreme Court justices, relying on a paper that Steve Calabresi and I published in 2006. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) The shooter in the Arizona tragedy has been identified (whether accurately or not) as Jared Laughner. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 10:54 am
Jim Lindgren and David Bernstein have posted, over at the Volokh Conspiracy, some advice for second-year law students. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:35 am by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) Nate Silver has a wonderful post comparing the 2012 Republican field to Republican and Democratic fields since 1999. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:35 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) If you want to follow the results of Wisconsin’s Senate recall primary, you might go to the Journal-Sentinel’s site.Early results show that the “real” Democratic candidates are beating the Republican-sponsored “fake” or “protest” Democratic candidates by about a 2-to-1 margin, except in District 14, where the real Democrat Fred Clark leads Rol Church by a still substantial 16% with 10% of precincts reporting.UPDATE:… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:05 pm by Paul Horwitz
 Because Jim Lindgren didn't set up the comments feature for this post, I think it's worth opening it up for comments here. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:01 am
  Happily, Jim Lindgren has a good post on her position, a post I agree with almost entirely. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) Professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University appreciated the scholarly comments he received from Volokh Conspiracy readers last year when I blogged his Privileges or Immunities article. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) Professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University appreciated the scholarly comments he received from Volokh Conspiracy readers last year when I blogged his Privileges or Immunities article. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:38 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) The flap over Christine O’Donnell’s debate comment suggests that many people still don’t know how Separation of Church and State became part of the law of the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:26 am
Jim Lindgren takes a sharp closer look at yesterday's Obama-Stephanopoulos colloquy:[A]s Obama sees himself slipping (temporarily) behind, he is willing make unproven charges that he probably wouldn't have been willing to say a week ago: that these guys are throwing rocks and hiding their hands.And Obama would probably have gotten away with it if Stephanopoulos had been willing to accept that. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:19 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) In addition to the new article by Jim Lindgren blogged about below, Larry Solum has the scoop today on new articles by Michael Dorf (Cornell) on A Theory of the Constitution, Mark Tushnet (Harvard Law School) on Taking the Law Away from the Courts, Benjamin Wittes (Brookings Institution) on Defamation and Treason in the Early Republic, Heather Gerken (Yale University — Law School) on Concurring by Nondecision, and Richard Posner (United States Court of Appeal… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:17 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) I have an editorial up on National Review Online on the history of the super-majority quorum requirement and my proposal to split out the collective bargaining provisions and pass them first: The Republicans could split the bill into three bills. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:12 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) The Wisconsin Senate today passed a resolution holding the absent Democratic senators in contempt if they did not return by 4pm today. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:10 pm by Jim Lindgren
(Jim Lindgren) Charles Fried tells part of the story about Elena Kagan’s appearance at a Federalist Society dinner at Harvard a few years ago: In February 2005 the student branch of the Federalist Society (a group founded in the early ‘80s to explore and promote conservative and libertarian perspectives on the law) held its national jamboree at Harvard Law School. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:52 pm
It really does violate the notion of liberty according to Jim Lindgren. [read post]