Search for: "Jimmie V. Reyna" Results 41 - 52 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 8:24 am by Chris Attig
Taranto (Opinion Author) (link to bio on Federal Circuit Court of Appeals website) Circuit Judge Jimmie V. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:50 am by Steven Koprince
In his strong dissent at the Federal Circuit, Judge Jimmie Reyna applied Justice Scalia’s precedent from a well-known case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm by RatnerPrestia
Judge Jimmie Reyna dissented, arguing that an offer for sale must be a commercial offer to trigger the on-sale bar and that the sale in this case, from a supplier to the patent owner, did not qualify. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:37 pm
The CAFC's newest judge, Jimmie V. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 8:51 am by Chris Attig
Dyk (Opinion Author) (link to bio on Federal Circuit Court of Appeals website) Circuit Judge Jimmie V. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Eric Caligiuri
” In dissent, Circuit Judge Jimmie Reyna strongly disagreed with the Federal Circuit majority. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) EWHC (Ch) Looney v Trafigura – a fable of copyright communication (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US IP Enforcement Coordinator issues annual report (IP Watch) US Chamber of Commerce releases 2011 IP policy agenda (IP Watch) New White House IP Advisory Committees elevate IP enforcement to highest level (IP Watch) (Patent Baristas) (Copyright Alliance) (The Domains) Jimmie Reyna to finally get confirmation hearing (Inventive Step) US to refresh… [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:00 am by RatnerPrestia
In his dissent, Judge Jimmie Reyna argued that a patentee’s infringement litigation expenses should be counted toward “exploitation” of the patent, and that the ITC improperly excluded litigation expenses not tied to licensing. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am by Robert Chang
In his dissent in the Federal Circuit, Judge Jimmie Reyna imagined a hypothetical restaurant called “Spics Not Welcome,” which, if it did not deny service to Latinos, might not run afoul of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]