Search for: "Joel Cohen v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Patrick A. Salvi
Transcription Joel: Hello, and welcome to “TalksOnLaw,” I’m Joel Cohen. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
New York County Commercial Division Justice Joel Cohen described the dispute in First Equity as “the aftermath of what had been an amicable business divorce. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On June 10, 2013, Joel Rosen, Esq. of Cohen, Placitella & Roth, PC confirmed referral of the underlying action. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[PrawfsBlawg] * Joel Cohen suggests that perhaps Ty Cobb should have kept his praise of Robert Mueller to himself. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 2:46 am by Peter J. Sluka
Cohen, in McCormack v Kuras, Index No. 656434/2021 [Sup Ct, New York County] and its related case, Triboss Brooklyn LLC v Kuras, Index No. 654282/2021 [Sup Ct, New York County]). [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
California viewed Cohen's display of "Fuck the Draft" on his jacket as "speech";[140] City of Ladue v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
State, 652 So. 2d 344, 346 (Fla. 1995); Lightbourne v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
And the winners are: McCormack v Kuras In this case, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Joel Cohen rejected attempts by majority members of a realty-holding LLC to remove the minority member as the LLC’s designated, sole managing member where the operating agreement (a) was silent on manager removal and (b) required unanimous member consent to amend the operating agreement. [read post]