Search for: "John/Jane 11-15 Does" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Badly conducted and interpreted science leads to research wastage,[11] loss of confidence in scientific expertise,[12] contemptible legal judgments, and distortion of public policy. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm by Ryan Goodman
The apparently inadvertent posting of the docket entry does not appear to indicate any nefarious action. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am by SHG
Most of us take for granted that pseudonymous litigants will use the name “John Doe” or “Jane Roe,” but that gives rise to a problem. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And so I think we just had a lot of experience in dicksterity Kind of what does it mean to try these things and to experimented and to do that? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman’s office announced he had voluntarily sought treatment for clinical depression, the reaction was far different, signaling a shift in the way those holding public office talk about mental health. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm by Jim Sedor
But the appointment does not require members to divest their own personal biotech investments. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Jane gave birth to the child in question and placed it for adoption. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The verdict was a major setback for Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed during the Trump administration and has spent three years probing whether the federal agents who investigated the 2016 Trump campaign committed wrongdoing. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Alleging that Trump has already privately decided to mount a 2024 campaign, American Bridge says he was then obligated to file a candidacy intent statement within 15 days of receiving contributions or making any expenditure over $5,000. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
  I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am by Katherine Pompilio
  Thursday, Jan. 20, 2022, at 2:00 p.m.: The John L. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]