Search for: "John B. Scott" Results 61 - 80 of 887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 5:18 am by David M. Goldman
Meserve Atlantis:Mayor Manny Fernandez Aventura:Mayor: Susan Gottlieb Bowling Green: Mayor Perry Knight Cooper City:Mayor Debby Eisinger Coral Springs:Mayor Scott J. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:20 am by Michael Markarian
Thirteen representatives whose districts favored Prop B voted to repeal the ballot measure: Jamilah Nasheed, D-60, 80.8% for Prop B Jerry Nolte, R-33, 70% for Prop B Noel Torpey, R-52, 65.5% for Prop B John McCaherty, R-90, 62.8% for Prop B Kurt Bahr, R-19, 61.7% for Prop B Paul Wieland, R-102, 61.5% for Prop B John Diehl, R-87, 61.4% for Prop B Doug Funderburk, R-12, 60.5% for Prop B T.J. [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:30 pm by David Lat
[Dewey B Strategic] * Too few people are willing to take ownership of change -- and this is a big problem, as Greg Lambert explains. [3 Geeks and a Law Blog] * John Fund asks: has the American Law Institute (ALI) strayed from its mission of describing the law and into advocating changes in the law instead? [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Woelke Leithart. 6 Phoenix Law Review 31-91 (2012).New Books:Christian Joppke and John Torpey, Legal Integration of Islam-- A Transatlantic Comparison, (Harvard Univ. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:56 pm
Among the races I noticed:Ex-mayor of Roanoke Ralph Smith got into the Senate.VBA Board member Robert Hurt got into the Senate.Bill Carrico and Anne B. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by WSLL
Civ.P. 12(b)(4) and (b)(5)? [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:24 pm by Sarena
  I was thinking that (a) that’s a pretty impressive number of books to digest, and (b) I’d never be able to review that many books. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, which held that property owners are no longer required to follow state compensation procedures before bringing federal takings claims under the Constitution; he argues that “[t]he concept of respecting past precedent is designed to ensure stability in the law, and that is laudable[, b]ut it was never meant to function as an insurmountable barrier to correcting past judicial mistakes. [read post]