Search for: "John Cato" Results 21 - 40 of 894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2012, 11:30 am
  I'll be joined by the Washington Examiner's Tim Carney (who writes constantly about the perils of US subsidies) and trade lawyer John Magnus (who has ample experience in the intersection between international trade law and subsidies). [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:29 am by Walter Olson
I’ve got more in a new Cato post; fuller coverage at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Watchdog.org, and the decision itself is here. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:29 pm by Ilya Somin
The event included questions and commentary by Kristen Cambell, Executive Director of PACE (Philanthropy for Active Civic Engagement), and John Samples of the Cato Institute. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
John’s River Water Management District and Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm by Orin Kerr
Many friends-of-the-VC will be panelists or moderators, too, including Walter Olson, Ilya Shapiro, Roger Pilon, and John Eastman. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Walter Olson
I was a guest this morning on John Gambling’s popular NYC morning show to discuss Free Speech Week, which Tim Lynch is covering all this week at the Cato blog. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 12:07 pm
Cato’s 14th Annual Constitution Day event will be two weeks from now: Thursday, September 17, at Cato’s offices in Washington, D.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:31 am by Walter Olson
At Cato today at noon, with John Fund, Armand Thieblot, John Samples, and moderator Chris Edwards, and watchable online. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:04 am by Media Law Prof
John Samples, Cato Institute, has published Why the Government Should Not Regulate Content Moderation of Social Media as Cato Institute Policy Analysis, No. 865. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 7:39 am
John Samples, Cato Institute, has published "Broadcast Localism and the Lessons of the Fairness Doctrine," as Cato Policy Analysis Series, No. 639 (May 27, 2009). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 9:47 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: The Social Security Administration Shouldn’t Be Deciding Who’s Too “Mentally Defective” to Own a Gun, July 5, 2016, CATO Institute, By Ilya Shapiro, Josh Blackman and Randal John Myer More Blog Entries: Who is Getting the Most from Social Security Disability? [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Michael Krauss, who has since become a good personal friend, told me to read John Locke, Montesquieu, and Algernon Sidney. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:24 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
John Samples has written this post for the Cato-Unbound series (about to wind up at the end of the month) on campaign finance disclosure.... [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:00 am by David Bernstein
  Think about John Kerry coming into Republican Senator Heinz’s fortune via Theresa, and you can see the potential problem. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 1:32 am by Walter Olson
Cato has been inveighing against forfeiture laws for two decades or more and it’s tremendously satisfying to see the issue take off this year. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:09 am by Steve Bainbridge
Walter Olson: “Rights-bearing individuals do not forfeit those rights when they associate in groups” argue my Cato colleagues Ilya Shapiro and Caitlyn McCarthy in the John Marshall Law Review [SSRN via Cato at Liberty]: Much of the criticism of Citizens United stems from the claim that the Constitution does not protect corporations because they are not “real” people. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:05 am by Ilya Somin
The second is a book forum at the Cato Institute, on Wednesday, Nov. 6, noon to about 1:30 (with commentary by George Washington University political scientist John Sides, and John Samples of the Cato Institute). [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:31 am
He considers and criticizes the arguments of political theorists such as John Rawls and Cass Sunstein, as well as popular “myths of individualism,” which he concisely refutes. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
See also Chris Edwards, Cato; First John Tamny disagreed with my observation in the WSJ that the Constitution allows states, not the federal government, the power to make lockdown decisions during epidemic outbreaks. [read post]