Search for: "John Doe Inc 1-2"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
The Board dismissed this Section 2(e)(1) opposition to registration of the mark HEALTHY HOME VACUUM, finding it not merely descriptive of vacuum cleaners [VACUUM disclaimed]. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 4:55 am
Avon Prods., Inc., No. 05-56047 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am
`1. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:14 am
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
JOHN SCHNATTER, Plaintiff,v.PAPA JOHN'S INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.C.A. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966 [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:39 am
Cogan that the mark PHOTOGREFER is merely descriptive of "online referrals in the field of photography," under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:18 am
"And so, the Board constitutionally affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Not so for product shape.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
We have often determined that arbitration was not waived.[1]Footnote 1 in Richmont Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
— sued some John Doe defendants in federal court over an offensive video attacking former (but then current) opponent Jon Huntsman. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:10 am
" What, pray tell, does Section 2(e)(1) have to do with genericness? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
In my practice, the most common type of § 103 rejection is one in which the Examiner alleges that specific elements are taught by Reference #1, and other elements are taught by Reference #2. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:47 am
Here’s what John had to say: 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Doe sought to hold Snap, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
In re Inovalon, Inc., Serial No. 85351975 [Section 2(e)(1) deceptive misdescriptiveness refusal of .The test for deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1) has two parts: (1) the mark must misdescribe the goods or services, and (2) consumers must believe the misdescription. [read post]
