Search for: "John Doe LA v. United States of America et al" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
McGraw Hill et al, was then heard on Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
(Pasting the Word document into the blog format significantly altered many of the indents, line spacing, and outline numbering for chapter subdivisions, so the TOC below does not look exactly like the TOC of the book itself.) [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
DSM N.V., et al: Disability claim dismissed because Plaintiff Was Not "Otherwise Qualified" to Perform the Essential Functions of Her Job* FILED* [1-14] Lockheed Martin sued by women for class-based sex/denial of opportunities for advancement discrim; more here* NEWS* [1-13] Teaneck fires Township Mgr following string of harassment lawsuitsNYDECIDED* [1-13] St Ct App: Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Sixth Circuit Holds Disabled Retirees Lack Standing to Bring Claims Under Disabilities ActLeroy McKnight, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon)   Colombia… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by admin
The United States Court of Appeals explained its understanding of complexity that should remove a case from the province of the seventh amendment: “A suit is too complex for a jury when circumstances render the jury unable to decide in a proper manner. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]