Search for: "John Doe Nos. 1 through 9"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
Defendant nos. 1 and 2 hosted a website "indiatvlive.com" which the Plaintiff came across in January 2007 while carrying out an internet search. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
In 1975, the SEC found, “there [was] virtually no investor interest in voluminous information” related to climate.[9] That was true, in part, because there was no “uniform method by which the environmental effects of corporate practices may be described,” and in part because “both the costs to registrants and the administrative burdens involved . . . would be excessive. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:25 am
(Doc No. 9). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
§ 1804(a)(7)-(9). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
See Orders at docket nos. 197, 223, 225, 251, 256 and 258. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
On the general issue of reliability, Oreskes proferred an opinion that scientific research is made reliable by “the collective vetting and critical interrogation of claims through scientific workshop, meetings, conferences, and above all, publication in peer-reviewed journals, formal scientific assessments and reports of government scientific agencies and laboratories. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Justice O’CONNOR delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 This case requires us to consider to what extent the “fair use” provision of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976, (hereinafter the Copyright Act) 17 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
A decent and humane society does not deliberately kill human beings. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
”[9] Once the nominating stockholder submits its notice, all stockholders would then have equal access on a timely basis to communications made by the nominating stockholder. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free"(John 8:32 (KJV). [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
This book is not meant to be the definitive guide to the legislative history of the NDAAs (though Lawfare covered virtually all of it), nor does it capture every single debate commentators had about the laws. [read post]
