Search for: "John Doe Y" Results 61 - 80 of 901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
[“(T)he fact that there can be no Constitutional impairment of pension system benefits does not create a constitutional right to stay in public employment” (see Cook v City of Binghamton, 48 NY2D 323); “(An) expectation of remaining in public employment ... is not within the scope of protection afforded by the Nonimpairment Clause. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:17 am by Yosi Yahoudai
[embedded content] The post Supreme Court agrees to hear ghost guns case appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:14 pm by AdamSmith1776
Rogoff, by the way, has superb credentials for doing this sort of thing:  A 1975 econ BA from Y ale, 1980 PhD from MIT, and professor at Berkeley, Princeton, and now Harvard. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:05 pm
  John Doe is not in the office on Monday. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:54 pm
(Sacchetti calls him Giovanni Acuto, or John the sharp-sighted.) [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
Scott Michelman, of California (Jay Rorty, of California, & John Reinstein with him) for the defendant. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:11 pm by Jon
Does that therefore mean that the basic method of operation of the law based in a logical fallacy? [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:33 pm by Native American Rights Fund
 John Tahsuda III named Principal Dep Asst Sec'y for Indian AffairsNews Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlIn the Intergovernmental section, we feature a story about the appointment of the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:30 am by Howard Friedman
Norman Doe, Dick Helmholz, Mark Hill, John Witte, Jr. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Bradley and John Finnis and political science professor Daniel Philpott, published on the blog site Public Discourse, says in part:[W]hen a university’s administration, knowing that “same-sex marriages” are in a Catholic understanding not truly marriages at all, nonetheless gives without legal coercion many signs and solid tokens of approving such commitments to non-marital sex acts, everyone can readily infer that the university actually does not regard any… [read post]