Search for: "John Does, " Results 1 - 20 of 40,154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2024, 4:51 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Why does the patent use a different name from the registered trademark? [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But does the fact that they were all non-violent make this latest conviction unconstitutional? [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
    Trump’s attorney John Sauer conceded at oral argument that even under the maximalist position that Trump has asked the Supreme Court to adopt—that he is shielded from criminal prosecution for all acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities as president—much of the conduct alleged in the indictment would not be immune because it is private. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
I can appreciate that establishing this business model is an excellent strategy for cutting off the fair use claim that LLM use does not interfere, for example, with Bateman’s sales. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm by Joanna Herzik
When he sent the alleged John Deere separation agreement, it had some strange wording, and the letterhead looked off. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on David Pozen, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford University Press, 2024).Paul Butler Like most users of illegal drugs, I have never been caught. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:30 am
Which leads me to believe that Joe Biden is literally trying to freeze the conflict in place permanently....And why does Biden want this anyway? [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
”  Masked, hooded individuals from outside of campus were filmed sneaking into undergraduate dorms at John Jay Hall. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Plaintiffs would lose even in the current Supreme Court; fairly clearly, in my opinion.The only thing that surprised me, though, was who was suing.The plaintiffs themselves are John Does. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
New Hampshire holding that a local government had the ability to impose and enforce regulations that create order and safety for its citizens, which does not infringe upon constitutional rights. [read post]