Search for: "John Does 1 - 3"
Results 21 - 40
of 9,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
Does 1-16, a case against students at the State University of New York in Albany, John Doe #3 has moved to extend the stay previously granted by the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.Defendant's motion to extend stay*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:56 am
Does 1-19, the District of Columbia case, being handled by Matthew Oppenheim personally, which targets students at George Washington University, the Court -- after reading the motion to quash filed by John Doe #3 -- has on its own initiative issued an Order to Show Cause ordering the plaintiffs to show cause, on or before November 29th:-why the defendant's motion should not be granted; and-why the Court's ruling should not be applicable to all… [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:16 pm
Hammond, Indiana -- Copyright lawyers for TCYK LLC of Los Angeles, CA sued for copyright infringement in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that John Does 1-9, all allegedly located in Indiana, infringed the copyrighted work "The Company You Keep," which has been registered by the U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 9:50 am
The defendant-appellant, John Doe No.1, anonymously posted allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff-appellee, Cahill, on an internet blog. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
Does 1-16, a case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, John Doe #3 has filed papers seeking to overturn the decision of the Magistrate Judge denying his motion to quash and to vacate.Declaration of Richard A. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
Does 1-17, the case targeting George Washington University, defendant John Doe #3 has filed his response to the RIAA's response to the Order to Show Cause issued by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.Response to RIAA response** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->Slashdot this story! [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Does 1-22, targeting Rhode Island College students, and BMG Music v. [read post]
New Rule Pertaining to John Doe Designations in Pleadings Recently Went Into Effect - Pa.R.C.P. 2005
6 May 2019, 9:43 am
On April 1, 2019, Pa.R.C.P. 2005, which governs the use of “John Doe” or “Jane Doe” designations in pleadings, took effect. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
Indiana John Does 1-18. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
Does 1-16, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the lower court denying a motion to quash.The appeals court held that the order was appealable, but rejected John Doe #3's arguments that :-the district court was without authority to refer the motion to the Magistrate Judge;-the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright infringement; -the "fair use" defense barred plaintiffs' case; and-the… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
"She ruled that the effect of the law was punitive rather than civil.Mitchell said a ruling in the appeal could affect the John Doe cases. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:25 am
Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all John Does except Doe Number 2, due to the fact that there was no basis for joining the different John Does in a single lawsuit.As it turns out, according to a report from Technician Online, "John Doe #2" doesn't actually exist:Students win first battle with RIAAJudge rules in favor of the students' motion to quash a set of lawsuits dished out by the… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:20 am
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/EducationLawProfBlog/~4/OQI9SUDEOv0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:54 am
Thus, the more time passes in John Doe’s case without (1) knowing who he is; (2) providing him with access to counsel; or (3) allowing the courts to even review the legality of his detention, the more alarmed I am by the government’s conduct—and the more alarmed you (and Ben) should be, too. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:08 pm
The decision in John Doe v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 4:21 pm
Does 1-4, after the university advised the Court that it could not identify John Does #8, 9, and 14 to a reasonable degree of technical certainty, Judge Nancy Gertner deemed the letter a motion to quash, and granted it, quashing the subpoena as to those defendants:The Court treats Boston University's 9/23/08 Letter as a Motion to Quash and GRANTS the motion with respect to Doe Defendants # 8, 9, and 14. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:43 pm
" It claims that "John Doe" has infringed 43 separate copyrighted works owned by Malibu Media. [read post]
