Search for: "John Does 1-2" Results 41 - 60 of 9,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the allegations: Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 allege that when they were thirteen years old they were solicited and recruited for sex trafficking and manipulated into providing to a third-party sex trafficker pornographic videos (“the Videos”) of themselves through the social media platform Snapchat. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:09 am
Does 1-40, the Tampa, Florida, case in which two (2) University of South Florida students designated as "John Does" by the RIAA have gotten together, hired a lawyer, and made a motion to quash the subpoena directed to the University, the Court has stayed the subpoena pending resolution of the motion. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:38 am by Peninsula Virginia Law
We previously sketched an outline of the typical recording industry lawsuit: "(1) the mass lawsuit against a large number of 'John Does'; (2) the "ex parte" order of discovery; and (3) the subpoenas demanding the names and addresses of the 'John Does'. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:17 pm by James
The accident took place in the 300 block of Greeley Street, around 2:30 in the afternoon. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:19 am
Here's yesterday's post, "John Doe prosecutor John Chisholm objects to what Stuart Taylor Jr. said about his anti-Walker vendetta. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 12:17 pm
In a Pittsburgh case targeting Carnegie Mellon Students which has previously been known as Fonovisa Records 1-9, in which the Court dismissed as to John Does 1-2 and 4-9 due to improper joinder, the RIAA has many months later amended its complaint to pursue "John Doe #3", a Carnegie Mellon student, in her own name. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:47 pm
"I'm guessing the Walker side of the deliberation had 2 aspects:1. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
In a rare unillustrated opinion authored by Judge Bucher, the Board reversed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark BANANA CHAIR, finding it not merely descriptive of "furniture, chair. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 4:44 am
"Weighing these factors, the Board found confusion likely and it sustained the 2(d) refusal.Deceptive Misdescriptiveness: Section 2(e)(1) misdescriptiveness requires (1) that the mark misdescribe the goods, and (2) that purchasers are likely to believe the misrepresentation. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:42 am
CSPAN covering it live here.I'm out of town and don't have time just now to blog in detail about this statement, except for a handful of very quick reactions:1. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
For what it's worth, although John gets the big picture of the MCA right, there are several inaccurate statements in John's Op/Ed, including these: 1. [read post]