Search for: "John Does 1-31" Results 21 - 40 of 1,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Larry Lewis
For example, John Spencer, an expert on urban warfare, has claimed that the IDF “has implemented more measures to prevent civilian casualties than any other nation in history” and is “the gold standard. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by David Pocklington
John Seaton Hirst [2024] ECC New 1, a funeral director sought permission to exhume recently cremated remains for the purpose of removing a small quantity and re-interring the majority within the same plot in the churchyard of St John’s Seaton Hirst [1]. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
  2   A First Reading of Definitive Text: The UNHRC Endorsement Resolution and the Endorsed UNGP       The Guiding Principles were unveiled in two stages, separated by about half a year, by John G. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm by centerforartlaw
Court’s Decision Based on the legal arguments presented, on November 24, 2023, Judge John G. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 10:17 am by Rob Robinson
Roberts, Jr., 2023 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (December 31, 2023), pp. 5-7). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Katie Hobbs does not have to publicly detail the money flowing to and from her main campaign bank account until January 2026, when she would face reelection. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Merchan (Aug. 11, 2023) State of New York response in opposition to Trump motion for recusal (June 14, 2023) Trump notice of motion for recusal (and memorandum of law in support; affirmation of Susan Necheles, Trump counsel, and two exhibits) (May 31, 2023) Trial orders Protective order (social media protective order) (May 8, 2023) Other State of New York opposition to Trump motions for reconsideration and ancillary relief request for (1) an in-person status conference to discuss… [read post]