Search for: "John Does 1-7 v. Taliban"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
The fourth group, John Does 1 Through 7 v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
That’s the fundamental legal issue at the heart of Doe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:28 am
In August 2021, just days after the fall of Kabul, a set of September 11th plaintiffs who received a judgment in the matter of John Does 1 through 7 v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm
In John Does 1-7 v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
(relisted after the March 7 Conference) Jennings v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
(relisted after the March 7 and March 21 Conference) Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:01 pm
Syndicate 102 at Lloyd's of London, No. 071197 In a matter concerning life insurance, grant of defendant's motion to enforce a subpoena issued by by arbitration panel is reversed where section 7 of the Federal Arbitration Act does not enable arbitrators to issue pre-hearing document subpoenas to entities not parties to the arbitration proceedings CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, MEDIA LAW Associated Press v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
Ingrid Wuerth brought us the Supreme Court’s 7-1 ruling in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:51 am
–1:15 p.m. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:03 pm
Turning to the first theatre of Operation Enduring Freedom: Yesterday, the new top commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, General John Campbell said that despite a recent uptick in violence and Taliban battlefield wins, he is “confident in what Afghan security forces can do. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The report chronicles the failure of my predecessor in the Bush Administration to listen to the objections of the JAG leadership about enhanced interrogation techniques, the result of which was that the legal opinion of one Lieutenant Colonel, without more, carried the day as the legal endorsement for stress positions, removal of clothing, and use of phobias to interrogate detainees at Guantanamo Bay,[1] Just before becoming President, Barack Obama told his transition team that the… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The paper originally published by the Gazette of Law and Journalism Part 1 of the paper was posted on 22 February 2011. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
This book is not meant to be the definitive guide to the legislative history of the NDAAs (though Lawfare covered virtually all of it), nor does it capture every single debate commentators had about the laws. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
The magnitude of the humanitarian crisis being triggered by Israel’s occupation of Gaza does not justify ‘exorcizing’ a terror organization. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Canadians have always been rather wary of being “freed” by their neighbours. 7. [read post]
