Search for: "John Dupont" Results 41 - 60 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 3:42 am by John L. Welch
The Board gave the survey results no weight.Finally, opposer claimed that applicant adopted its mark in bad faith, but the Board found no intent to deceive consumers, even if applicant did intend to copy opposer's logo and website (which it changed after being contacted by opposer).Balancing the duPont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it sustained the opposition.Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 2:35 pm
  Featured in that magazine is our own John Monica's article entitled  "Ramping up the EPA's Nanoscale Material Stewardship Program. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:00 am
  Overall, Dupont estimates that, by performing early case assessment on 18 of their cases, they reduced their costs by over a third. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
It agreed with applicant that, as to certain other documents (673 pages in all) purportedly relevant to the likelihood of confusion issue, opposer was required to indicate the relevance of each page by duPont factor. [read post]