Search for: "John M Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Barrett Prettyman U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Kavanaugh asked John Sauer, Trump's counsel, if "a clear statement in the statute covering the president" is required "if the president's official acts are going to be criminalized. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
I'm not going to go through them. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Barrett and Henry “Hank” M. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
John Deere Co., 494 U.S. 516, 527–29 (1990). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:35 pm
Both clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts during the court’s 2007-08 term. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
[This post, which is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, continues from the first installment.] [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Robert M. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
Tune in next week when I’m proven wrong. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
For instance, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan raised the overall question of how Colorado’s ability to bar a candidate could be used as a precedent in many other states—including some states that have threatened to retaliate by barring other candidates if Trump’s ineligibility is upheld. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I are the primary proponents of the former argument, and Kurt Lash is the primary proponent of the latter argument. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Did John B. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Barrett Jr. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2355, 2376–84 (2023) (Barrett, J., concurring). [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm
Julia Mahoney, John S. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
It does not, however, fundamentally change our understanding of what the current iteration of the Roberts Court--led on hot-button issues by hard-right Justices and not John Roberts--is all about. [read post]
