Search for: "John Sauer" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:01 am by Matthew A. Seligman
    Trump’s attorney John Sauer conceded at oral argument that even under the maximalist position that Trump has asked the Supreme Court to adopt—that he is shielded from criminal prosecution for all acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities as president—much of the conduct alleged in the indictment would not be immune because it is private. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:51 am by Albert W. Alschuler
John Sauer, championed this formulation, and at least one Supreme Court justice—Brett Kavanaugh—appeared to embrace it. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
John Sauer argued before the Supreme Court yesterday, taking the position that former presidents have “absolute immunity” for so-called official acts they take in office. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Kavanaugh asked John Sauer, Trump's counsel, if "a clear statement in the statute covering the president" is required "if the president's official acts are going to be criminalized. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
John Sauer, encourages the Court to see far beyond Trump to the true horror of criminally prosecuting ex-Presidents:The implications of the Court's decision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
” At the petitioner’s counsel’s table is John Sauer of the James Otis Law Group of St. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
Representing Trump, John Sauer told the justices that without presidential immunity from criminal charges, the “presidency as we know it” will be changed. [read post]
Leading the argument in favor of Trump’s immunity argument was the former president’s attorney, John Sauer. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
John Sauer, who represented Trump, turned inside out the clear language of the Constitution, and tried to blithely cast aside positions taken by other Trump lawyers during his second impeachment trial.Cynics who believe that lawyers will say anything to win a case would not have been surprised by Sauer’s verbal gymnastics. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
John Sauer, offered no arguments of merit. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm by Amy Howe
John Sauer urged the justices to proceed slowly and with caution. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
John Sauer acknowledged that an “erroneous denial of a claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution unquestionably warrants” Supreme Court review. [read post]
John Sauer said in oral arguments that Trump’s recent remarks created no clear and present danger and that the gag order “sets a terrible precedent on future restrictions on core political speech. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:16 am by Seán Binder
Pjotr Sauer reports for the Guardian. [read post]