Search for: "John and Jane Doe(s) I-V"
Results 1 - 20
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
That's the question raised by Doe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
John Doe I, supra. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
What's with this Kolaveri about John Doe Injunctions? [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Let’s face it, Doe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm
As reported in an ACLU press release, earlier this week a Texas state trial court in Jane Doe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:44 am
The Plaintiffs then filed a motion to dismiss their claims against the individuals and the John/Jane Doe defendants with prejudice. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:15 am
In a brand new paper I advocate a novel approach to deciding when litigants should be permitted to sue using a John Doe or Jane Doe pseudonym. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 4:14 am
In those cases I have brought where sexual assault is a component, I have used "Jane Doe" pseudonyms to protect the privacy of my clients. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
CP Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:48 am
I thought I'd repeat a post I wrote up about this case last year, when it was handed down; see also Jacob Sullum's post from yesterday on this subject. [* * *] From Friday's [June 28, 2019] Seventh Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm
A motion for a preliminary injunction was filed by Plaintiffs Maages Auditorium; CD15CL2001, Inc., d/b/a Bazz and Crue and X4B Lounge; D2; and John Doe and Jane Doe, for all those similarly situated, to with a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment was filed by Defendant Prince George’s County. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am
Her opinion begins: Appellant John Turner asks us to overrule nearly four decades of circuit precedent holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to preindictment plea negotiations. . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe matter presided over by Mme Prothonotary Aronovitch concerning Teksavvy’s motion to be reimbursed by Voltage for its “reasonable costs in the event it had to release information” arising from Prothonotary Aalto’s order of February 20, 2014 which ordered that that:3. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
Doe v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
I've recently started looking into anonymous "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe") litigation; generally speaking, people are presumptively required to sue in their own names, but sometimes courts allow them to sue anonymously. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am
In Jane Doe v City of Detroit, the court upheld summary judgment for Detroit on a transgender employee’s complaint of harassment. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
I can be as innocuous as, “I hope John Smith has a quick recovery from cancer,” or spiteful, like, “I can’t believe John Smith has cancer and I have his workload while he’s out on medical leave. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, the complaint is dismissed as to John/Jane Does I-XX as well as NYSIF. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Thus, the complaint is dismissed as to John/Jane Does I-XX as well as NYSIF. [read post]