Search for: "John and Jane Does (6)" Results 1 - 20 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Enough was revealed, however, to see that the published articles were not what they claimed to be.[6] In addition to litigation discovery, in March 1996, a surgeon published the results of his test of the Shanklin-Smalley silicone sensitivity test (“SILS”).[7] Dr. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Although we must prepare for confronting dodgy methods in front of jury, asking for scientific due process that intervenes and decides the methodological issues with well-reasoned, written opinions in advance of trial does not seem like too much. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Nicholas Nugent
Following the January 6 Capitol riot, attention turned to Parler's alle [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am by SHG
Most of us take for granted that pseudonymous litigants will use the name “John Doe” or “Jane Roe,” but that gives rise to a problem. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
To give one example from the Ninth Circuit: The plaintiffs in this case previously were denominated "James Rowe, Jane Rowe and John Doe. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
 § 367.3, enacted in 2019, adds to that: A protected person who is a party in a civil proceeding may proceed using a pseudonym, either John Doe, Jane Doe, or Doe, for the true name of the protected person and may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the protected person. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:06 am by Alan Neff
The New York Times reported that Chief Justice John Roberts’ wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, “has made millions in her career recruiting lawyers to prominent law firms, some of which have business before the court. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman Sponsored a Bill from the Hospital. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman’s office announced he had voluntarily sought treatment for clinical depression, the reaction was far different, signaling a shift in the way those holding public office talk about mental health. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
While in the National Archives, Plaintiffs were subject to a pattern of ongoing misconduct by federal government officials, specifically National Archives security officers, Defendants John Does and Jane Doe, who targeted Plaintiffs and intentionally chilled their religious speech and expression by requiring Plaintiffs to remove or cover their attire because of their pro-life messages.6. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:37 pm by Jim Sedor
But the appointment does not require members to divest their own personal biotech investments. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:39 am by Emma Snell
Capitol during the Jan. 6 attack was sentenced to 7.5 years in federal prison yesterday. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 7:28 am by Eugene Volokh
" Had Plaintiff filed a complaint in which she identified herself as Jane Doe and Named Defendant as "John Doe"—i.e., providing anonymity both for herself and the accused—the Court would have granted the request for relief with little hesitation. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:13 am by Emma Snell
“We expect that Russia will do what Russia always does — they will veto it,” U.S. [read post]